SocialFunds.com
Please support our sponsors



Subscribe to Free weekly SRI News Alerts

Keyword Search
Find SRI News Articles Related To:

Complete List of Articles by Category

RSS
What is RSS?
Add to MyYahoo


Recent News Headlines from SocialFunds.com

Climate Scientist Joins Exxon Board (02/03/17)

Investors Challenge Mutual Funds on Proxy Voting (01/20/17)

Many Large Mutual Funds Continue Failure to Address Climate Change (01/07/17)


Sustainability Investment News Order reprints | Send it to a friend | Print it | Save it  

June 11, 2014

Shareowner Rights Under Attack
    by Robert Kropp

Abetted by comments by an SEC commissioner, the US Chamber of Commerce petitions to keep shareowner resolutions from returning to proxy ballots.

SocialFunds.com -- Earlier this spring, Securities and Exchange (SEC) Commissioner Daniel Gallagher railed against several aspects of the current proxy rules of the Commission. At Corpgov.net, corporate governance advocate James McRitchie quoted Gallagher as stating, "Activist investors and corporate gadflies have used these loose rules to hijack the shareholder proposal system."

Free
SRI Mutual Funds GuideMcRitchie writes, "He then goes on to outline a program of reform that would essentially gut the proxy proposal rules affirmed by recommending the following requirements for shareowner proposals:

• Instead of $2,000 of shares, Commissioner Gallagher recommends a minimum of $2 million a percent to be determined.
• Instead of a holding period of one year, Commissioner Gallagher recommends an unspecified term, since one year “is hardly a serious impediment to some activists.”
• The SEC should address “the practice of ‘proposal by proxy,’ where the proponent of a resolution—typically one of the corporate gadflies—has no skin in the game, but rather receives permission to act ‘on behalf’ of a shareholder that meets the threshold.”
• SEC rules provide an exception to its ‘ordinary business’ exclusion for ‘significant policy issue’ proposals. Gallagher wants each of those proposals to be voted on by the full Commission.
• When it comes to the language of proposals, Gallagher wants to reverse the burden of proof for those that companies allege are materially false and misleading or vague. Shareowners should have the burden of proof, rather than companies.
• Instead of proposals needing 3, 6, or 10% of votes in support to be resubmitted in subsequent years, Gallagher proposes 5, 20 and 50%."

The US Chamber of Commerce and other business groups seized on the last of Gallagher's recommendations, petitioning the SEC for "amendment of the Resubmission Rule to increase significantly the percentage of favorable votes required before the company is obligated to include in its proxy materials the substance of proposals shareholders previously rejected."

However, as McRitchie pointed out, "Gallagher’s recommendations would do nothing to protect investors or promote fair markets and capital formation. Instead, he would essentially sanction the complete turnover of the shareowner’s proxy to managers to facilitate their own entrenchment, with the possible exception that some rights to submit proxy proposals might still be maintained by hedge funds, the only shareowners recognized in Gallagher’s speech as representing the rights of 'ordinary' investors."

Recently, Timothy Smith of Walden Asset Management commented on the matter. "We suspect that the Chamber hopes the SEC will open the door to a proxy rule review that would result in multiple radical changes limiting the influence of shareholders," Smith writes.

"Walden will advance a different perspective in defending the current rules that govern the submission of shareholder resolutions," he continued. "We will explain how shareholder proposals on environmental, social, and corporate governance matters often raise issues with a direct impact on long-term shareholder value (e.g., effective management of climate change risk or encouraging stronger board oversight and independence). We will highlight that many companies embrace the substance of these shareholder proposals as good for business. We will make the case that fiduciary duty compels us to raise these matters that address long-term risk and brand reputation. And finally, we will argue that sometimes voting support is modest in early years but later garners significant shareholder backing as knowledge about an issue accumulates."

Smith noted also that Walden met with Commissioner Gallagher to express its views on current proxy rules.

© SRI World Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Order reprints | Send it to a friend | Print it | Save it

Related Articles

Top

Mutual Funds | Community Investing | News | Sustainability Reports | Corporate Research | Shareowner Actions | Financial Services | Conferences
Home | Login | Contact | Support This Site | Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Reprints


© 1998-2008 SRI World Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Created and maintained by
SRI World Group web development services
Do your own research Work with an advisor SRI News SRI Learning Center Home